According to a recent poll conducted by Strategic Vision, Obama, the Iowa forerunner, received 30% of the Democratic vote, while Huckabee received 29% of the Republican vote in Iowa. Of course there is a margin of error to consider (4.5%); however, if this poll truly represents the trends of Iowan voters, as well as other states’ voters, Obama’s greater support from his party’s voters could truly help him win the Democratic nomination. As the Iowa Caucus approaches, Obama has begun to appeal to the workers in response to Edwards’ similar yet consistent campaign strategy. Obama may be worried about Edwards’ gaining momentum and winning in Iowa, or Obama may have realized the potential success of this strategy. On the other hand, Obama may be aiming for 2nd place in Iowa, which would still help him win votes nationwide. In addition, as the Iowa Caucus approaches, Obama is campaigning fiercely and somewhat successfully to capture undecided voters. Obama, selling himself in a somewhat simplistic manner, sheds light on his political skills, as well as his lack of “baggage”, which many of the other Democratic (and Republican) contenders could not claim. In the final days before the caucus, individuals, such as Deval Patrick, the Massachusetts governor, have been helping Obama campaign throughout Iowa. Patrick, an African-American who lived in the South Side of Chicago, discredited the popular reason voters dismiss Obama: his lack of experience. He compared Obama’s experience (or lack of) to his own before he became governor.
Furthermore, during the days before the Iowa Caucus, Obama has launced two ads in Iowa. Individuals, including the Hillary Clinton campaign, are criticizing Obama for the misrepresentation of facts in his ad titled “Interest”. This ad claims “experts say Obama’s plan is the best”; however, although the Iowa City Press Citizen claimed this in concurrence with their endorsement of Obama, the newspaper failed to cite any of these “experts” . In addition, the ad states that “ [the plan] guarantees coverage for all Americans” ; however the original quote from St. Paul Pioneer Press states “Obama’s plan guarantees coverage for all Americans but does not require all to have it”. On the other hand, “Edwards and Clinton would require all Americans to have health insurance”. In response to this heightened criticism, Obama defends his healthcare plan claiming “that every single person who wants health insurance is going to be able to get health insurance.”
On a grave note, many of the presidential contenders, including Obama, have been able to demonstrate their strength or weakness with foreign policy matters because of Bhutto’s “death.” Obama responded to this crisis asserting “ [Musharraf] has not obeyed the constitution. As long as we are supporting somebody who the Pakistani people themselves believe has subverted democracy, that strengthens the hand of the Islamic militants.” Clinton, and other presidential candidates with greater foreign policy experience, have used this situation to demonstrate the “need” for a president with great experience. Obama took a stab at Clinton by claiming that her authorization of the Iraq War has worsened Pakistan’s problems. Now, we must cling to our seats waiting for the results of the very important Iowa Caucus. If Obama fails to accumulate sufficient support in this caucus and suffers a subsequent downward spiral, it is uncertain whether Obama will run again for president. Michelle, Obama’s wife, states “we're not doing this again”. For now, on behalf of all the presidential candidates: Happy New Year and let the excitement of the primaries begin!